Passive Smoking - Where There's Smoke...Since this is "Stop Smoking Week", an article on the effects of Passive Smoking seems appropriate. There is ample evidence of the damage active smoking does, but what is the impact of passive smoking, and is there good evidence to support the claims of its negative health effects. In fact there are. The recent report of UK government's Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health (SCOTH) concluded that that passive smoking is a cause of lung cancer, and that in those with long-term exposure the increased risk is 20-30%. It also concludes that passive smoking is a cause of ischaemic heart disease, of serious respiratory illness, asthmatic attacks, and middle-ear disease in children, and of the sudden infant death syndrome. 1 A K Hackshaw2 in an analysis of 37 published epidemiological studies of the risk of lung cancer (4626 cases) in non-smokers who did and did not live with a smoker, found compelling confirmation that breathing other people's tobacco smoke is a cause of lung cancer. The key messages of this study were:
The effect of passive smoking with respect to cardiac disease3 was studied by Ichiro Kawachi of the Harvard School of Public Health, who followed 32046 healthy, non-smoking women enrolled in the nurses health study for a period of 10 years (Circulation 1997;95:2374-9). He found that healthy, non-smoking women who reported regular exposure to passive smoke at home or in the workplace had a 91% greater relative risk of heart attack than those who reported minimal passive smoke exposure. Those who reported occasional exposure had a 58% greater relative risk. The relationship between sudden infant death and maternal smoking was investigated by Peter S Blair, Peter J Fleming et al.4. Their study confirmed the increased risk of the sudden infant death syndrome associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy and showed evidence that household exposure to tobacco smoke has an independent additive effect. Parental drug misuse had an additional small but significant effect. Their key points were:
It has been postulated that passive smoking causes more frequent and more severe attacks of asthma in children who already have the disease, and may increase the number of cases of asthma among children who have not had previous episodes. This hypothosis was confirmed by Chilmonczyk et al.5 in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine. Chilmonczyk used urine cotinine measurements as a biological marker of the exposure to tobacco smoke, and was able to demonstrate that acute exacerbations of asthma in children increase with exposure to second hand smoke. It is apparent then that environmental smoke is a significant health hazzard. As physicians we should use this information to press for more smoke free public areas, and we must also make our patients aware of these risks to their own and their childrenšs health. References:
This page last updated February 14, 1999
Berry of the Week Archive ] [ Return to Berries Home Page |